Previous month:
July 2011
Next month:
September 2011

August 2011

Be Your Own Attorney - Lawyer in your Rhode Island Divorce - Represent Yourself Pro Se!

A few things that you should know about Rhode Island Divorce.

1.  If someone tells you handling your Rhode Island divorce is easy and they did it without the assistance of a lawyer at all then chances are the person who told you this missed something crucial in their RI divorce proceeding that is likely to come back and haunt them in the future.

2.  If someone tells you that you should NEVER handle your own divorce and that you should ALWAYS hire a Rhode Island lawyer to represent you in the Rhode Island Family Court, then the person who told you this is simply telling you that he or she would not be comfortable representing himself or herself before the court in their own Rhode Island Divorce.  My suggestion, don't let their fear override your own ability to make a good decision for yourself about your divorce.

3.  Every divorce proceeding in Rhode Island is different because no two people are identical and no two marriages have the same relationship.

4.  Whether you think your Rhode Island divorce is easy or not, you should always seek the coaching of a Rhode Island lawyer who regularly practices divorce in the Rhode Island Family Court and is well versed in the practice of Rhode Island divorce law.

5.  Generally speaking, if you and your spouse can communicate then chances are you can reach an agreement between the two of you regarding how you should go your separate ways.  If you can do that, then there is a very good chance that with some effective Rhode Island divorce coaching you may very well be able to represent yourself and save yourself considerable time, frustration, anxiety and especially money that may not need to be spent on lawyers.

When it comes to your own Rhode Island divorce, don't sell yourself short!  

I've happily been able to tell many people, "Sure you can handle your divorce.  Let's get started!" 

With as little as four (4) sessions at only $135 per session, you can handle your own divorce affordably, at your own pace, and as your finances allow with professional help each step of the way.  It doesn't get better than that!  

 

Authored By:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Attorney-at-Law

Rhode Island's Full-Time Divorce* Lawyer is Now
Rhode Island's Only Divorce and Family Law Coach
!!

Discover the Tremendous Benefits You Receive by 

Participating in Family Law Coaching Sessions!

Visit the RhodeIslandDivorceCoach.com

Call (401) 632-6976 Now
to
Schedule Your Low-Cost Rhode Island Divorce* or Family Law* Coaching Session!

Experience the Difference!

Copyright 2000 to Present.  Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
 Offering Rhode Island Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Coaching for a New Millenium!

Note: If this article contains a case scenario with names, dates or amounts, any resemblance any connection to any person or situation now or previously existing is purely accidental, unintentional, and is merely a mistaken creation in the mind of the reader.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all attorneys in the general practice of law.  The court does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any particular field of practice.

- - Recommended Websites - -

Pearsall.net | AttorneyPearsall.com | Rhode Island Divorce Tips | ChristopherPearsall.com | GuaranteedWealth.com | Rhode Island Divorce Attorney | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer | ChrisPearsall.com | LegalScholar.com | Pearsall-Law-Associates.comRhode Island Divorce Attorneys | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers | Rhode Island Divorce Coach  |  RI Divorce Coach | RI Divorce Lawyer on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Coach on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer on Facebook.com| Attorney Chris Pearsall at LawGuru.com | Rhode Island Family Law Lawyer - RI Consumer Tips


Your RI Divorce Can Be Easier - Use a RI Divorce Coaching Lawyer

Rhode Island Divorce was imminent for Jared and Tina Armston.  They both knew it.  So they started making plans to go their separate ways.  They could reach agreement on almost everything but they dreaded going through the Rhode Island Family Court and get their divorce process started.
 

DIVORCE WORRY 

Divorce is a word that makes most people worry.  It's understandable.  Most people have no idea what to expect.  So wouldn't things be much easier if you knew what to expect?  Sure!

If you were in a sailboat and you wanted to get to a particular direction you can think of "worry" as that huge wind that is blowing against your sail pushing against the direction you want to go in and threatening to tip your sailboat over.  Hey, it's scary!  I know.  I've been there and I've been through it before I became a lawyer.

I remember that divorce wind of "worry" wanting to capsize the little sailboat I was in and drown me.  This was at a time in my life when I knew NOTHING about how a Rhode Island Divorce works at all.  It literally drives some people insane.
 

THE SOLUTION TO "DIVORCE WORRY"

So what can you do to deal with that divorce worry, right?  Do what Tina Armston and many like her have done.  Come and see me for a Coaching Session!  Tina was apprehensive for our first 10 minutes together and by the time we were done I saw her shoulders relax, she sat in my office comfortably and she was no longer calling me Attorney Pearsall as I had heard for the first 10 minutes.  The more I explained to her and the more I answered her questions the better she felt and the more confident she became.  By the end of our session her Rhode Island divorce from Jared was no longer that overwhelming mystery that was threatening to topple her sailboat and drown her.  Tina had helped herself by coming to me to increase her knowledge and answer her questions about Rhode Island divorce.

Tina's divorce coaching session was one hour. During that time I drew several diagrams and a few numbered lists so she could literally see what to expect.  She was able to tell me about her marriage with Jared and she could see that I cared as I wrote down points to talk to her about while she told me the types of things that were causing her to worry so much.

By the end of our hour together she didn't have any questions that I hadn't answered for her.  She kept thanking me over and over as she wrote me a check for $135 for our Rhode Island divorce coaching session.

Tina kept thanking me as I escorted her back upstairs, held the door open for her and shook her hand.  The following dialog took place. 

FEELING BETTER

Tina:  "I feel like a great weight has been lifted off my shoulders Chris.  Thank you so much. 

Attorney Pearsall:  It is was my pleasure Tina.  Do you mind giving me your honest opinion of what you thought of my "coaching" approach to divorce law?  Be as critical as you want, I just want to make sure I help the people who come to see me.  If you'd rather not say, that's okay too.

Tina:  Oh, well it certainly wasn't what I expected. I was scared about meeting with a lawyer and what to expect but I felt comfortable with you right away.  I like it that you explain things and you didn't talk down to me.  You paid attention to me and you listened to my questions and answered them.  It was great but you really should charge more, it was worth it. [Tina shook my hand again.]

Attorney Pearsall:   Thank you Tina I really appreciate your feedback.  If you think of anything I could have done better or differently, please let me know.

Tina:  I can't think of anything but I can tell you this was alot better than the two other lawyers who gave me their "Free Consultations", I didn't learn anything except how much money they wanted from me so they could represent me.

Attorney Pearsall:  I'm sorry you had a bad experience or two but feel free to contact me for another session if you want help throughout your divorce.

Tina:  I'll call you next week to set up a second session if that's okay.

Attorney Pearsall:  That's fine Tina.

Tina:  How much would that be?

Attorney Pearsall:  Each of my sessions are the one hour minimum of $135.00.  If you want to go over an hour they are just like this one, I charge for each quarter of an hour after that.

Tina:  I'm sure I'll only need the one hour.

Attorney Pearsall:  That's fine Tina.  We can do quite a bit together in an hour.

Tina:  Have a nice day Chris!

Attorney Pearsall:  You too Tina!  Watch your step walking back to your car.

 

WHAT HAPPENED WITH TINA?

So how did Tina's divorce end, right?  Suffice it to say that Tina came back to me several times for more Rhode Island divorce coaching sessions, she worked out an agreement with her husband Jared and did such a good job representing herself that an attorney in the courtroom went up to her and told her what a good job she did.  

Tina called me right after her Nominal Divorce hearing to let me know about the compliment she received.  She thought I deserved the compliment and not her.  I made sure she knew that the compliment was hers.  I wasn't there to represent her.  I did not say a thing for or against her in court.  All I did was coach her through her Rhode Island divorce so she understood things.  The compliment was entirely hers.

So your RI divorce can be easier than you think.  It doesn't have to be a time filled with so much fear where you feel overwhelmed ever minute and don't know what is going on or what to do next.  

Many times, if you don't have an overly complicated or bitter divorce, if you keep things amicable it can be a heck of alot easier.  How?  Follow Tina's lead . . . Use a RI Divorce Coaching Lawyer!

Authored By:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Attorney-at-Law

Rhode Island's Full-Time Divorce* Lawyer is Now
Rhode Island's Only Divorce and Family Law Coach
!!

Discover the Tremendous Benefits You Receive by 

Participating in Family Law Coaching Sessions!

Visit the RhodeIslandDivorceCoach.com

Call (401) 632-6976 Now
to
Schedule Your Low-Cost Rhode Island Divorce* or Family Law* Coaching Session!

Experience the Difference!

Copyright 2000 to Present.  Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
 Offering Rhode Island Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Coaching for a New Millenium!

Note: If this article contains a case scenario with names, dates or amounts, any resemblance any connection to any person or situation now or previously existing is purely accidental, unintentional, and is merely a mistaken creation in the mind of the reader.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all attorneys in the general practice of law.  The court does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any particular field of practice.

- - Recommended Websites - -

Pearsall.net | AttorneyPearsall.com | Rhode Island Divorce Tips | ChristopherPearsall.com | GuaranteedWealth.com | Rhode Island Divorce Attorney | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer | ChrisPearsall.com | LegalScholar.com | Pearsall-Law-Associates.comRhode Island Divorce Attorneys | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers | Rhode Island Divorce Coach  |  RI Divorce Coach | RI Divorce Lawyer on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Coach on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer on Facebook.com| Attorney Chris Pearsall at LawGuru.com | Rhode Island Family Law Lawyer - RI Consumer Tips


RI divorcee seeks Marital Deduction on Estate Feds Claim Fraud


Feds: RI divorcee seeks $1.7M marital deduction

August 18, 2011|Laura Crimaldi, Associated Press

 

A woman has been accused by federal prosecutors of trying to have a divorce judgment thrown out after tax collectors levied $2.8 million in taxes and fines against her dead ex-husband’s estate on the grounds it wasn’t entitled to a marital deduction.

In a civil complaint filed on Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Providence, the federal government accuses Jo-Ann DerManouelian of trying to get her divorce judgment voided in an “improper and collusive attempt’’ to claim a marital tax deduction for her ex-husband’s $17.7 million estate.

DerManouelian, a former waitress living in Johnston, is among three co-executors of the estate of businessman Aram DerManouelian, who died in 2006 at age 67, the complaint shows. The couple’s divorce was finalized on Jan. 6, 1994. She claims in state court filings, however, that her husband fraudulently obtained the divorce.

After Aram DerManouelian died, his estate filed a federal tax return that claimed a marital deduction of nearly $1.7 million, according to the complaint. The Internal Revenue Service rejected the deduction and issued a fraud penalty of $1.1 million in March.

On June 3, the estate petitioned the U.S. Tax Court to rule it had properly declared a marital deduction, the complaint said. Rhode Island state court spokesman Craig N. Berke said Jo-Ann DerManouelian filed a motion on July 7 in the Family Court of Newport County to have her divorce judgment voided.

A motion hearing on the divorce case has been scheduled for Sept. 29, Berke said. The judge assigned to the case hasn’t taken any action, he added.

Jo-Ann DerManouelian claims in state court that her husband initiated divorce proceedings in 1993 because his marriage to her prohibited him from leaving real estate and pension proceeds to his son from a previous marriage. The couple had no children together, court records show.

“When Jo-Ann asked Aram why he was filing for divorce, Aram would only tell Jo-Ann that she should not fight what he was doing and that he, Aram, would pay his lawyers $2.00 for every $1.00 that his lawyers kept from her if she contested the divorce in any way,’’ her attorney Keith Kyle wrote in court filings.

He also claims the couple lived together as husband and wife from the 1980s until Aram DerManouelian’s death.

“On January 6, 1994, there were no irreconcilable differences between Aram and Jo-Ann, Aram and Jo-Ann were living together as husband and wife, there was no irremediable breakdown of the marriage between Aram and Jo-Ann and the entry of the (divorce judgment) January 4, 1994 was procured by fraud on the court by Aram,’’ Kyle wrote.

Kyle didn’t return a message seeking comment Thursday.

Federal prosecutors, however, say Aram DerManouelian’s marital status was listed as “divorce’’ on his death certificate. It also says he twice referred to Jo-Ann DerManouelian as his “former wife’’ in his will. She also is referred to as his “former wife’’ each of the 12 times she’s listed in trust documents related to the estate, the complaint said.

The complaint states Aram DerManouelian listed his filing status as “head of household’’ or “single’’ until 2005, when the estate filed a joint income tax return that listed Jo-Ann DerManouelian as his spouse. He also deducted alimony payments to his ex-wife from his adjusted gross income, the complaint said.

A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice, which is handling the case, had no immediate comment on Thursday.

An obituary for DerManouelian published in The Jamestown Press said he was the “beloved husband’’ of Jo-Ann DerManouelian. He was the founder and president of Warwick-based National Velour Corp. and Johnston-based American Foam Corp., said the obituary, which didn’t cite a cause of death.

American Foam sold the foam blamed for fueling a West Warwick nightclub fire that killed 100 people on Feb. 20, 2003. The fire, at The Station nightclub, began when pyrotechnics for 1980s rock band Great White ignited the foam, which was used as soundproofing around the stage. The company later agreed to pay $6.3 million to settle lawsuits from survivors and victims’ relatives.

DerManouelian also was the owner and developer of Portsmouth Industrial Park in Portsmouth and Omni Park in Middletown, the obituary said.

Jo-Ann DerManouelian, 61, and the other estate co-executors did not return messages on Thursday. Attorney Michael S. Marino, who’s handling the tax court case, also did not return a message.


RI Divorce for LegalForms.com, CompleteCase.com, and LegalZoom.com?.. It's time to Step Aside for Rhode Island Divorces!

LegalForms.com, CompleteCase.com, LegalZoom.com, and others . . . . please do me a favor and step aside gracefully.  I've spent more time helping people fix the mistakes in your forms and instructions which people in the Rhode Island family court system rely upon as "legal advice."  

As a Rhode Island lawyer who focuses my practice exclusively on divorce and family law it takes more time and energy to deprogram these poor people from what you have "done for them" than it would if they came to me in the first place.

I don't care how many forms and instructions you try to churn out to help people, nothing will ever hold a candle to or help more than the personal one on one assistance people can receive from an experienced and licensed Rhode Island lawyer who routinely handles divorce cases.

Admittedly, for those who don't know about my services or are unable to find a Rhode Island lawyer who might provide them with similar services, your paper forms system is certainly less costly than hiring an experienced lawyer in Rhode Island outright, but in my estimation it should be a last resort in Rhode Island divorce situations.

Rhode Island Divorce Coaching is no longer a sideline but is a major part of my law practice along with my continued representation of courtroom clients.  My goal is to help practitioners learn a new method of practice for divorce . . . Coaching.  It is my goal to spread the word and perfect the practice so that it is and will become a major part of many practices in years to come.  

Practitioners who have a hard time getting clients need to wake up to the needs of the people and try this affordable method of practice rather than throwing in the towel and continuing to remain unemployed simply because they can't get a position with a law firm or don't have lots of money to invest to start up their own practice.

Rhode Island Divorce Coaching is new, it's innovative, it's cost effective for clients and it is a win-win-win situation for the lawyer, the court, and especially the client.

For three years now I have endeavored to have fellow members of the Rhode Island Bar join me in this coaching endeavor such that I could help them to help others.  In variably attorneys shy away from this method of practice because they don't see it as profitable enough.  That's understandable.  They have certain expectations as lawyers as to what they want and need to make and this doesn't fit the bill because they look at it only on the surface.  In turn, even those who are aware of my new practice method have not even taken the opportunity to help clients who won't hire them and mention my service to the prospective client who may find this alternative to be within their budget.

Despite these temporary setbacks which I believe will be short lived, I am still confident that Rhode Island Divorce Coaching (as I call it . . .) will play a major role in the future of helpful legal practice for the betterment of the clients and the betterment of how our legal profession is viewed by the public.

In the end, while I don't have a budget to get the exposure of LegalZoom.com, CompleteCase.com and LegalForms.com, I do not in any way believe that they are a substitute for even a single hour with me and yet on average appear to cost twice as much.  

Every divorce is different and is factually driven.  No matter how many forms these companies create, they will never be able to explain every divorce in every instance.  The wording varies, the circumstances vary, and sometimes the approach will change with the facts.  A form can't answer a question for you right there on the spot like a coaching attorney could do.  Even if access to a licensed attorney is purchased in some fashion, how fast might you get a response?  Do you know who is responding?  Do you have a choice who will respond?  Might a Rhode Island attorney who practices mostly real estate closings be answering your very serious divorce questions?  It is certainly possible!

The only thing worse than getting legal advice from a truly unknown and unchecked source is to get bad advice from that source.

So, LegalForms.com, CompleteCase.com, LegalZoom.com and others who do not provide personalized experienced service from a lawyer who is licensed to practice and routinely practices in family court, please step aside and let attorneys who know what we are doing help these good people.  Is it truly worth wrangling $300 or so from some poor man or woman just to provide a bunch of forms and a little bit of knowledge that may do more harm than good?

Ultimately, I'm tired of picking up the pieces from forms services with seemingly empty promises for these people.  Sometimes people need a hero in their divorces.  Though I have never thought of myself as anything other than a caring and experienced lawyer in the area of divorce and family law, you seem to be depicting yourselves as waiving the cape and providing not just a cape but the whole superhero package for those in a Rhode Island divorce situation.  

While Rhode Island Divorce Coaching isn't for everyone and doesn't work in every case, at least I can adjust on the fly to the needs, questions, and facts of each coaching client.  It's something you just can't do and it makes all the difference.

LegalForms.com, CompleteCase.com, LegalZoom.com and other services like them that are out there with the same form and instruction based divorce and family law services filled with lots of promises ....forewarned is forearmed.... 

If people need a hero and you're all they think they've got, I'm more than willing to dawn the cape and do what you can't.  Someone has to be there to protect the people. For some people it might as well be me.


Authored By:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Attorney-at-Law

Rhode Island's Full-Time Divorce* Lawyer is Now
Rhode Island's Only Divorce and Family Law Coach
!!

Discover the Tremendous Benefits You Receive by 

Participating in Family Law Coaching Sessions!

Visit the RhodeIslandDivorceCoach.com

Call (401) 632-6976 Now
to
Schedule Your Low-Cost Rhode Island Divorce* or Family Law* Coaching Session!

Experience the Difference!

Copyright 2000 to Present.  Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
 Offering Rhode Island Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Coaching for a New Millenium!

Note: If this article contains a case scenario with names, dates or amounts, any resemblance any connection to any person or situation now or previously existing is purely accidental, unintentional, and is merely a mistaken creation in the mind of the reader.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all attorneys in the general practice of law.  The court does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any particular field of practice.

- - Recommended Websites - -

Pearsall.net | AttorneyPearsall.com | Rhode Island Divorce Tips | ChristopherPearsall.com | GuaranteedWealth.com | Rhode Island Divorce Attorney | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer | ChrisPearsall.com | LegalScholar.com | Pearsall-Law-Associates.comRhode Island Divorce Attorneys | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers | Rhode Island Divorce Coach  |  RI Divorce Coach | RI Divorce Lawyer on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Coach on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer on Facebook.com| Attorney Chris Pearsall at LawGuru.com | Rhode Island Family Law Lawyer - RI Consumer Tips


Men in Rhode Island Divorces - When it's Over for You it May Not Be for Her - A Woman's Scorn

Men involved in difficult Rhode Island divorces, especially those involving minor children, should be aware that even when the Final Judgment enters, this does not mean that the difficulties are over.

Bart and Sheila - A Divorce and Beyond 

Bart and Sheila were married for more than twenty (20) years.  They had two children who were still minors when Bart filed for divorce.

Bart felt he tried everything to keep the marriage together but finally he couldn't take it anymore.  He felt isolated from Sheila. They weren't friends.  They weren't lovers.  They weren't even good at co-parenting.  They had grown apart.  

Bart was a fairly successful stock broker who did well for himself and his family.  Even though Sheila had a degree in chemical engineering she had grown accustomed to Mark being the sole financial provider for the family.  Sheila had no interest in working.  Bart asked her several times to find employment and help with the finances so they could pay things off and retire early.  Sheila refused.

Bart became friends with his clients Sally and Mark Jensen who came to him after the stock market began to plummet.  They asked Bart to turn things around for them and save everything they had.  

While things deteriorated in Bart and Sheila's marriage, a brokerage fluke and fast plummet in the stock market caused Mark and Sally to lose just about everything they had.  Eventually Bart exhausted all options for Mark and Sally and feeling very sympathetic to them Bart explained to them that he had done everything he could but there was nothing more that could be done.  

Without their precious nestegg, Mark and Sally no longer remained his clients.

Bart's marriage had continued it's breakdown until Bart decided he could no longer remain married to Sheila.  Bart moved out of the marital home.  In Bart's heart and mind his marriage was done except for the legal formalities.

Divorce was filed during which Bart moved residences several times.  Each time, Bart's "residence" was broken into.  Bart found his documents and computer tampered with.  Even Bart's private office was vandalized.

Bart kept in touch with Mark and Sally and found out that they were divorcing as well.  Bart began to find interest in Sally and to spend time with her.  Suddenly, both Bart and Sally found their residences broken into and a strange man following them from time to time.

Sally became understandably unnerved, perhaps more so than Bart as he struggled to simply get through his divorce and move on with his life.

Things became more extreme as Sally found her personal computer invaded.

Bart tried to brush off all the coincidental violations that seemed to relate to his divorce even though his wife and her attorney were making him miserable despite his attempts to be amicable. 

Bart found himself in court over the next year defending himself against countless bogus motions that wasted his time, cost him money, and pressed his sanity.  Bart's relationship with Sally was getting harder to keep together as Sally became more and more vocal about her belief that Sheila was behind all the invasions in her life.

Finally the Final Judgment of Divorce entered in Bart's case.  It was a small sense of freedom.  Yet Bart was pulled back into court yet again with allegations that Bart had been violent toward Sheila. 

What Might Sheila Do?

Given the scenario I presented for this Rhode Island Divorce, if Bart were to marry Sally, immediately buy a home and then bring his childen to the home for visitation, what might Sheila do?

To understand the answer to the question is it necessary that we try to understand Sheila, so let's do that.

Based upon the information we have, Sheila had grown accustomed to being taken care of by Bart.  She could do what she wanted to do whenever she wanted to do it.  If Sheila wanted to go shopping, it seems that the money was there for her to indulge herself.  If Sheila did not want to work Sheila could tell Bart that she didn't want to work.  It actually seems that financially Sheila was not required to work in order for the bills to be paid and for her to enjoy the lifestyle to which she had become accustomed.

The above account of things would indicate that Sheila had become complacent and comfortable with her life.  Everything was familiar to her, allowed her substantial control without worry, gave her a feeling of financial security, and probably her own personal belief that she was loved, attractive, and that her world was stable.

Sheila had an advanced degree and had married a man in a reputable field of business and was the mother of two children.  There is nothing to indicate that Shiela was anything but confident and comfortable with who she was and had a strong self image.  Mark had remained married to Sheila for more than 20 years which provided historic long-term support that Sheila's healthy self image was justified.

If this makes sense regarding how Sheila sees things in her marriage with Bart, let's add the Rhode Island divorce to the mix.  Bart leaves the marital home and files for divorce.  

Sheila's Mindset?

Sheila probably no longer feels loved.  More likely, Sheila feels directly rejected.  Instead of feeling comfortable and complacent, Sheila can now see her financial stability and comfortable lifestyle crumbling.  Sheila may now feel that the control she once had had been ripped from her hands.  Bart has not only said he wanted a divorce, rather he has taken an affirmative step confirming that he fully intends to proceed down that path.  Suddenly, Sheila does not know what the future will bring.  For the first time in years she has to think about things that Bart always took care of.  Sheila may no longer have the power to say that she doesn't want to work.  In fact, because of Bart's decision she literally have to get a job.

Sheila sees her comfort zone going out the window.  She may believe that Bart is ripping her very comfortable lifestyle from her.  Bart is tearing away her control.  Bart is literally yanking the stability out from under her after more than twenty years.  She no longer feels comfortable.  Sheila feels rejection, fear, panic, discomfort, and uncertainty about the future will bring and how she will survive.  

Sheila, perhaps for the first time in decades, is now being forced to deal with what many of us already deal with on a daily basis.  It could very well be that Sheila does not take responsibility for these feelings or for the breakdown of the marriage itself.  Why?  Because perhaps in Sheila's mind she has not done anything to change anything.  It is only Bart's actions that caused this change.  Sheila did not want any change and yet she is being forced into change that she may see as being out of her control.

In the end, Sheila may simply feel that Bart is at fault.  Some women see what Bart has done as personal rejection.  To Sheila, Bart has indirectly told her that she is not good enough to be with him, that she is not attractive enough to be with him, that she is substandard and she deserves better.  In essence, some women believe they are being told "you are broken."  

To a woman who has a strong sense of self, acceptance of a marital breakdown may trigger even deeper.  A woman's rationalization process does not involve logic but a rather a strong belief that it wasn't a matter of not being a good wife, mother or partner, but rather that there must be someone else.  

She may not want to believe she has in any way participated in the collapse of the marriage from her husband's view and she may hold fast to the idea that she did everything right.  If this occurs in Sheila's mind then another shift takes place.  It is a very dangerous shift which heightens Sheila's anger at Bart and any other person that Sheila believes he may have been involved in.  I call this the "Other Woman Syndrome."

Sheila's mindset may be so engrained in her complacent and comfortable lifestyle that her own self-image  refuses to take any personal responsibility for the breakdown of the relationship.  In this case, Sheila adhere's to the belief that that there MUST BE another woman.  

Sheila may go so far even to create "another woman" or imply affairs with other women to justify her divorce to herself or other people because she cannot accept that the relationship has broken down for reasons that have nothing to do with anything other than the fact that Bart is no longer happy.  Sheila may even use "another woman" to paint herself as a victim and attract sympathy and attention from the court or from others in order to replace the comfort she previously had and regain control by trying to damage Bart's image or reputation in court or in the community simply to make herself feel better.  These are only a minor way in which a woman's anger rises to the level of a scorned woman, in which case anything may be possible from a woman such as Sheila. 

In my scenario of Mark and Sheila's Rhode Island divorce, the single action of Mark's decision to leave the house, or to proceed to divorce court may cause Sheila to 

(1) become angry by Mark's rejection;

(2) become extremely fearful of what her future is going to be like;

(3) believe there is another woman and undertake measures to find any way possible to find another woman (even if there isn't one) to blame the failed marriage on;

(4) become bitter and vengeful against Sally and anyone associated with her and try to hurt her (and those associated with Sally) physically, emotionally, mentally, financially and in any way possible to "get back at" Sally for ruining her marriage and her life;

(5) become angry by Bart's attempts and/or ability to move forward with his life and want to hurt Mark as well as anyone  to make Mark feel as unstable, unsafe, and hurt inside as Sheila herself feels;

(6) neglect her children knowing it will hurt Bart to see the children hurting and try to shift the blame of the children's pain on Bart for causing their neglect by going forward with the divorce;

These are just a few of the possibilities arising from the Rhode Island divorce and the marital breakdown.

In truth, mental instability can give an indication of suicidal tendencies of the wife, killing minor children to get back at the husband and cause him guilt, a combination of the two, cutting brake lines in the ex-spouses car or the new wife of an ex-spouse, harming the children of a new spouse, physical injuries to herself as the ex-wife and countless other things which may in the mind of a person such as Sheila cause Bart pain, anguish or sorrow.   

Any evidence of instability by a wife during the course of the divorce is an indicator that future difficulties may not only arise, but may worsen.  

 

Understanding Bart!

Bart is not a vindictive man though he may get angry at times when truly pushed to his limit.  He is or at least tries to be optimistic and seeks only to move forward with his own life without causing others pain.  Bart looks for the best in everything around him and tries to "take everything as it comes."  Bart is a man who does not see the world as "doom and gloom" but does know that there are those sides of life that are not too pleasant.   However, men like Bart believe that moving forward with one's own life without "aggravating" or "intentionally hurting" others is the best route.  In essence, Bart rides the wave when it comes with the belief that it will eventually end and your surfboard will coast gently onto the sandy beach.  

Bart does not realize that there are those who may see his actions as hurtful even if his intentions and his actions do not outwardly show that he is in any way trying to be hurtful.  

Bart's greatest challenge in his divorce and his life perspective is that he does not consciously adopt the notion that others are vindictive and vengeful probably because he is not a vengeful or vindictive person himself. 

Non-Legal Advice

Let's assume that I already know of all the circumstances about Bart's marriage and divorce including his ex-wife's behavior, the break-ins, the person who was following him and Sally, etc.  Bart approaches me several months after his Final Judgment of Divorce has entered.  Bart tells me that he is remarried, that he just bought a house, and that he is looking forward to surprising his children by showing them their new bedrooms next weekend at the new house he and his wife bought. 

I congratulate Bart on his new marriage and the house.  Then I ask Bart if his ex-wife knows that he remarried and bought the house.  Bart says that she'll know soon enough so he didn't want to rock the boat.

As a caring person and professional I would be less than a good person or lawyer if I didn't offer this little piece of non-legal advice to Bart in such a situation.

"Bart, I don't want to dampen your spirits but you may have just started the Running of the Bulls in Spain. . . you've got a red bullseye taped to ass, and unfortunately you picked the only running shoes on the planet made entirely of solid lead."

Authored By:

Christopher A. Pearsall, Attorney-at-Law

Rhode Island's Full-Time Divorce* Lawyer is Now
Rhode Island's Only Divorce and Family Law Coach
!!

Discover the Tremendous Benefits You Receive by 

Participating in Family Law Coaching Sessions!

Visit the RhodeIslandDivorceCoach.com

Call (401) 632-6976 Now
to
Schedule Your Low-Cost Rhode Island Divorce* or Family Law* Coaching Session!

Experience the Difference!

Copyright 2000 to Present.  Christopher A. Pearsall, Esquire
 Offering Rhode Island Rhode Island Divorce and Family Law Coaching for a New Millenium!

Note: If this article contains a case scenario with names, dates or amounts, any resemblance any connection to any person or situation now or previously existing is purely accidental, unintentional, and is merely a mistaken creation in the mind of the reader.

* The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all attorneys in the general practice of law.  The court does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any particular field of practice.

- - Recommended Websites - -

Pearsall.net | AttorneyPearsall.com | Rhode Island Divorce Tips | ChristopherPearsall.com | GuaranteedWealth.com | Rhode Island Divorce Attorney | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer | ChrisPearsall.com | LegalScholar.com | Pearsall-Law-Associates.comRhode Island Divorce Attorneys | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers | Rhode Island Divorce Coach  |  RI Divorce Coach | RI Divorce Lawyer on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Coach on Twitter | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer on Facebook.com| Attorney Chris Pearsall at LawGuru.com | Rhode Island Family Law Lawyer - RI Consumer Tips